Introducción
La línea MacBook Pro se ha simplificado. ¿En serio? El modelo de 13" todavía viene en dos sabores, pero son más difíciles de distinguir - la única pista es el número de puertos. ¿Se quedó Apple con el modelo de entrada y encontró espacio para una Touch Bar de alguna manera, o este nuevo modelo es una versión reducida del [guía|111384|diseño] existente (más caro) Touch Bar? ¿O es algo completamente nuevo? Sacudamos todas las partes y veamos qué se cae.
¿Estás buscando más desmontajes? Síguenos en Facebook, Instagram, y Twitter para ver todas las novedades sobre desmontajes. Para recibir noticias, suscríbete a nuestro boletín de noticias.
Qué necesitas
Resumen del Video
-
-
Antes de que lleguemos demasiado lejos, echemos un vistazo a lo que este modelo nos ofrece:
-
Pantalla de 13.3 pulgadas retroiluminada por LED con tecnología IPS; resolución nativa de 2560 x 1600 a 227 pixeles por pulgada, con amplia gama de colores (P3)
-
Intel Core i5 de 4 núcleos y 1.4 GHz (Turbo Boost de hasta 3.9 GHz) con 128 MB de eDRAM
-
8 GB de memoria LPDDR3 de 2133 MHz integrada
-
SSD de 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB, o 2 TB
-
Dos puertos Thunderbolt 3 (USB‑C) compatibles con carga, DisplayPort Thunderbolt, USB 3.1 de segunda generación
-
Coprocesador personalizado Apple T2
-
-
-
Estamos encantados de que el conector de los auriculares esté de vuelta, incluso esté solo. (Dos puertos más un conector de auriculares todavía se siente un poco tacaño en una máquina "Pro", ¿verdad?)
-
A estas alturas, el procedimiento de apertura ya es la misma historia de siempre. Al sacar los tornillos pentalobe y clips, podemos echar un vistazo a un MacBook Pro que, en realidad, tiene un aspecto sorprendentemente similar al del modelo anterior de teclas de función.
-
La nueva capacidad de la batería de 58.2 Wh supera ligeramente a la batería de 54.5 Wh que se encuentra en el antiguo modelo de tecla de función. Tal vez así es como se mantiene al día con la barra táctil, el sensor de identificación táctil y el chip T2, manteniendo la misma duración de la batería de 10 horas.
-
Incluso supera a la batería de 58.0 Wh en el modelo más caro de 13", que tiene más núcleos y TDP para alimentar.
¿ Hay algún problema si se reemplaza la batería original de 58.wh con una de 54.5wh ? ¿ o no hay problema ?
-
-
-
Para dejarle hueco al sensor Touch ID junto a la Touch Bar, Apple parece haber recortado un poco la masa del disipador de calor, a la izquierda del tubo de ventilación. Compara la versión 2016 "Function Keys" (parte superior de la imagen) con el modelo de este año (parte inferior).
-
¿Deberíamos estar preocupados? El enfriamiento ya parecía que se estaba quedando corto en estos portátiles ultraplanos "Pro". El TDP de 15W en el procesador de este año no es menor que el de 2016.
-
Giramos el tornillo de panqueque del conector de la batería y apagamos la energía, con un poco de ayuda de nuestro kit de destornillador Manta.
-
Donde antes estaba el SSD modular del modelo 2016, despegamos una pegatina para encontrar un escudo soldado. Tal vez no sea sorprendente, pero sigue siendo decepcionante: uno de los últimos componentes actualizables de la línea MacBook Pro ha desaparecido por completo.
Any soldering can be desoldered…but that’s easier said than done.
-
-
-
-
El altavoz opuesto al ventilador también parece escuálido en comparación con su predecesor en 2016.
-
Los ingenieros de sonido de Apple son básicamente magos, pero somos escépticos de que incluso los asistentes puedan mantener la misma calidad de sonido en un altavoz tan pequeño.
-
Sólo unos pocos tornillos Torx aseguran estos altavoces, no están pegados como en tantos otros modelos. El reemplazo no podría ser más fácil.
-
Esta placa de conexión modular Thunderbolt hace que sea una buena actualización. La última vez, estos fueron soldados a la placa lógica. Esta nueva configuración es más parecida al resto de la moderna línea Pro.
-
Un poco más lejos y nos encontramos con otra obra maestra modular: el módulo de conexión de auriculares. Incluye la toma para auriculares, el micrófono y el conector Touch ID, y puede reemplazarse fácilmente sin tener que arrastrar una costosa tarjeta lógica.
The predecessor was the mid-2017 Function Keys MacBook Pro 13”, not the late-2016 model.
Apparently that headphone jack module has a Hall-effect sensor that is extremely fragile and will be ruined if you touch it. Oh, and the whole assembly is so fragile you’re suppose to replace it every time it gets removed.
a este modelo se le puede cambiar el ssd? o esta fijo y soldado?
Fixed and soldered.
Fijo y soldado.
-
-
-
Levantamos la placa lógica y vemos lo que se esconde:
-
Procesador Intel SREZ2 Core i5-8257U
-
Co-procesador T2 Apple APL1027 339S00604
-
2x Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2 GB LPDDR3 RAM (4 GB total en este lado )
-
Almacenamiento flash 64GB Toshiba TSB 42260 F1473 TWNA1 1914
-
Controlador Intel JHL7540 Thunderbolt 3
-
338S00466-A0 (posiblemente un PMIC de Apple)
You’re right! We’ve made the change. Thank you!
-
-
-
Y encontramos más cosas enterradas:
-
Modulo NFC seguro NXP 80V18
-
Texas Instruments CD3217B12 y TPS51980B (posiblemente controladores de potencia)
-
2x Samsung K4E6E304EC-EGCG 2 GB LPDDR3 RAM (para 4 GB de e este lado , y 8 GB en total)
-
Almacenamiento flash de 64 GB Toshiba TSB 42260 F1473 TWNA1 1914 (para un total de 128 GB)
-
Codec audio Cirrus Logic CS42L83A
-
Intersil 95828A HRTZ X915HKB y 9240H1 8905FD
-
Módulo Bluetooth/Wi-Fi Murata 1SA 339S00616 SS9521026
What is the silkscreen marking on the 2 devices (speaker drivers) at the top right corner of the PCB?
-
-
-
En cuanto al teclado, es el mismo diseño de interruptor de mariposa de la generación 3.5 que se descubrió en la primera actualización del MacBook Pro en mayo.
-
No está muy claro si Apple espera que estos teclados sigan necesitando reparaciones, o si esta es sólo su forma de tranquilizar a los clientes traumatizados de que está bien comprarlos.
-
Se rumorea que Apple pronto desconectará el diseño de mariposa para siempre, volviendo a los interruptores de tijera más confiables, así que tal vez sea un poco de la columna AA, y un poco de BB.
-
-
-
Nos encargamos de esto con un toque ligero, así que eso es todo por ahora Definitivamente encontramos algunas sorpresas en este MacBook con teclas de disfunción. Recapitulemos:
-
La bar-ificación táctil trajo una SSD soldada (mal), puertos modulares (bien), un altavoz encogido y un disipador de calor (¿eh?), y un chip T2 (comodín).
-
El teclado recibe sus materiales actualizados, pero todavía está en la lista de programa de servicio. Al igual que una mariposa, este diseño de teclado pronto puede resultar efímero.
-
- El trackpad se puede quitar sin afectar a la batería.
- Los tornillos patentados pentalobe continúan dificultando las reparaciones.
- El ensamblaje de la batería está todavía muy bien pegado a la caja, lo que complica los reemplazos de un consumible.
- La memoria RAM soldada limita la actualización y longevidad.
- La SSD ya no es reemplazable, pero como antes era una unidad patentada, el almacenamiento recién soldado tiene aproximadamente el mismo efecto para el reparador medio.
Consideraciones Finales
Calificación de Reparabilidad
(10 es lo más fácil de reparar)
Un agradecimiento especial a estos traductores:
100%
Estos traductores nos están ayudando a reparar el mundo! ¿Quieres contribuir?
Empezar a traducir ›
39 comentarios
I love how professional these breakdowns have become over the years!
SSD chips do go bad over time; most vendors recommend total replacement after 240 gigabytes of overwrites per gigabyte of chip. Soldering down the SSD flash chips means these machines need Ball Grid Array rework when reconditioned for resale after lease return. Apple will be doing that rework, so we can maybe assume the ticklish microsurgery doesn't phase them?
Why solder them down in the first place? Because of the T2 chip. T2 is very…possessive of SSD memory.
But apple is not gonna do the repair beyond the warranty, so I don't believe it's a consolation that apple would do that repair when I buy computers to last me a decade. You seem even a bit optimistic about this.
QuincyMB -
I’m very curious about SSD failures over time. Are there are any stats out there? I’m talking about the high quality NAND used in the likes of Apple SSDs and not USB/SD-card failures.
biscuit -
Ya no. Nearly every consumer grade SSD comes with a 5 year warranty (or ~150 TBW per 250 GB). An SSD will last for decades without issue or loss of space. Modern SSDs eclipse traditional HDDs and even those these days can last a good chunk of time (my NAS is purring and it’s HDDs are about 6 years old).
When you say “most vendors” I’m sure you meant to say no one. People have long been crunching theoretical usage patterns in most general consumer usage against SSDs and have figured they’ll last something like 15 years, give or take. Obviously it depends on your usage pattern, but if you wrote 20 GB per day, every day for the life of drive, you’ll hit the manufacturers estimates in ~ 20 years (150 TBW per 250 GB). And that’s the bottom end. So at the bare minimum, with even aggressive usage (45GB a day), you’re likely going to see 10 years, easy. That’s if the drive dies right at 150 TBW/250GB, which is pretty %#*@ unlikely.
Tiem -
@Tiem, you must work for APple as you’re trying to stand proud on false data. That’s Apple marketing style 100%. So..let’s clear the air before your willful misuse of data spreads as ignorance. • 60 to 150 TBW , which takes your 20 yr span and cut is down to about 7. • ..So a SPAN of 7-20 years. • ..I won’t go on about the rest of your abuse of information relay with puffed chest ego writing. • ..SSDs can fail -> making a $40-$100 fix into a $1000 apple repair. (sarcasm with a smile in good fun: … Or am I wrong and it’s a possible death trip to !&&* where Apple swoops in and saves you for $1000 ?) USE FULL & REAL DATA! — Enjoy your week everyone!
Ram, processor bump isn’t that significant. More ram will help it feel snappier after you have more background tasks going.
Both, you can’t decide later on. But if you really are pushed for one, do the RAM, or better still the SSD size.
Totally RAM for sure.
pop -
RAM obviously. Processor is limited by cooling - upgrade to the other 13’ with double cooling fans if you need more CPU performance.
Good overview. A throwaway device should be at throwaway prices. Apple could give these things away if the customer would sign a long term rental agreement for iCloud Drive, Apple Music, and other Apple rental units. I do like the repairability and upgradeability of my 2012 MBP though.
How about a complete keyboard replacement due to a liquid damage?
How easy it is to replace it.
People say that the Mac Book Pro is quiet and not hot.
I don’t wonder why. I wonder why do they buy it.
Doing stuff that need less than 7W TDP call for a 7W TDP Atom (or, slightly better, Celeron or i3 or i5). You don’t need this in a expensive, irreparable platform.) Yes it look cool. I would say Microsoft Surface is better (CHEAPER?! seriously, apple.)
Solder-on HARDDRIVE? What the what.
Let’s face it. When your computer broke down (not the connector, not the keyboard, since most often it’s the motherboard), and you are stuck with two soldered on-board chips guarded by T2, I don’t know what you would like to do.
When any other computer broke down you can at least have a chance to visit your harddrive’s contents by pulling it out.
Connect the surface mount chip to another surface mount device to inspect it? Sure. But who will do that?
Да и вообще SSD на 128 Гб в 2019 году - это просто бред. Apple, WTF?
My MacBook Pro 2011 has 320 Gb!
Reminds me of the inside of an iphone, or ipad Looks as though Apple has applied the success of that technology to their laptop line. Thus making their laptop just another version of that design. It is inevitable that the iPad and Laptop will eventually morph into one as they are coming so close together in operational capability at this point. This appears to confirm that assumption Basically this 2019 macbook pro is nothing more than an iPad design, with external ports and a keyboard. I’m not at all surprised.
About the comments concerning the SSD lifetime: I had a Mid-2012 Retina Macbook Pro bought 7 years ago, a few days after it came out. It had the first SSD in a MacBook Pro, the first Retina display and I maxed it out to 16GB RAM. I’ll have to admit that I had my doubts about the longevity of the SSD at the time.
Well that MacBook Pro got used heavily at least 10 hours a day for 7 years until finally the logic board died. I took out the SSD and I’m still using it inside an enclosure, attached via USB to my new Mac!
Surely the SSD technology has improved since 2012? But even if the tech hasn’t improved at all, I can tell you from experience that your MacBook SSD will most likely outlast the usable lifetime of the laptop (or other components).
Completely agree - there was a webpage about an SSD test where 250GB drives were continuously written until they failed. TLDR - every 250GB of SSD provide 25 years of heavy office use (based on actual heaviest office use among the place running an experiment). So a 1TB drive is good for a century of realistic heavy workload. Even with QLC that has 1/3 of an endurance these are ridiculously long life times that only concern Cloud servers and the like.
So this is the Touch Bar version? What about the non touch bar version, does it still have a replaceable SSD for this years model?
@gadgetuser The non-Touch Bar version has been reworked into what you see in this teardown—Apple reconfigured it and added a Touch Bar. In other words, all MacBook Pros now come with a Touch Bar. If you want a Touch Bar-less notebook computer new from Apple in 2019, the Retina MacBook Air is your only option.
In my opinion, every claim Apple makes about being environmentally responsible and their products being recyclable is nullified by their continued policy of intentionally engineered obsolescence. Hard soldering in RAM and SSD, and glueing in the battery serves no-one but Apple and since recycling is the least best option compared to repair or re-use, their hypocrisy is staggering. Sure, we like thin products but not that much. Why don’t they try launching a 2mm thicker variant of the MacBook Pro with user replaceable RAM, industry standard SSD and battery, and standard USB ports, then see which one users will end up buying. I for one would certainly prefer to know that my money is buying something that will still be working or repairable in 10 years time rather than the current time-bombs Apple is producing where the SSD and battery WILL fail as the technology is inherently degenerative.
“…as the technology is inherently degenerative.”
“…glueing in the battery serves no-one but Apple…”
“…recycling is the least best option compared to repair or re-use…”
When you make false statements like that, you can create all kinds of incorrect conclusions. Let me correct you.
SSD life and reliability is better than it has ever been. The same can be said of Li battery life.
Permanently attaching the battery lowers the cost (consumer benfit), prevents shifting (consumer benefit), and allows for more space and thus the maximum size battery / capacity (consumer benefit). It motivates the manufacturer to use batteries of the highest quality, since they know that every user who has to have their battery replaced prematurely results in a negative mark on the company, and potential loss of future sales (qualtiy battery = consumer benefit).
Every item you use goes into a landfill. Recycling puts it into a finite ‘recycling’ loop, but every product eventually leaves that loop and goes into the ground. Think about that.
This model just has one fan. The higher-end MacBook Pro models have two.
does this model feature a data recover port like earlier models with soldered-on SSD's?
For all those complaining about upgrades, remember that Macs are targeted towards users who don’t tinker with their systems. They just want something that works out of the box. To that end, the MacBook Pro does that. We use them for our creative department at work; I use them for my IT work. We have a ton of PC laptops too. We service the PC laptops all day. We never touch the Mac laptops, because they just work. We have super old MacBooks that are still serviceable with the OEM components.
Also remember that software is coded for specific hardware. Programmers are not going to create code that’s backward compatible forever, and eventually support gets dropped for older hardware. Typical consumers don’t need a computer that lasts forever. They need, and want, one that works with current applications and fits in with the current trends.
The previous year macbooks had a major issue where the display connector backlight pin (a high voltage pin) was next to a low voltage pin that goes directly to the CPU (potentially, and historically, frying CPU’s). Did they fix that in this model and stick a ground pin between the two?
What about the 4 thunderbolt version? Could you provide a tear down for that version because I know if is very different. There are two fans instead of the one in this one.
I don´t feel good at all about the fact that the SSD are soldered down on my MBP Touch Bar. People say that the SSD will outlast the computer anyway, but i mean surely an SSD can go bad at any point i guess? You have all kinds of health parameters like bad block count, retired block count, uncorrectable error count, etc. etc. I dont want to start to see the numbers on those parameters getting higher and higher on my soldered down SSD.
And on my MBP 2011 where i have installed an SATA SSD, i averaged about 30GB writes per day, only from computer processes, without me writing to the disk.
What are the solutions for a failed SSD which is soldered down, can it even be replaced by anybody else than Apple? Im thinking about the fact that the T1/T2 chip seems to be involved with the SSD?
And how much does Apple charge for the job of replacing an SSD?
But where 128gb ssd ????
